Archive for February, 2010

Distraction!

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Also, my daily quota of exclamation point.

I stumbled across a book called Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. The Introduction and Preface are absolutely charming (in particular, the author’s stance on postmodernism), and the Prologue thus far is delightful. It’s a selection of origin myths, following a certain formula, from a number of different people. The epigram for the chapter (in a Cyrillic original and an English translation) is from Janghar,  the Kalmyk national epic. Why had nobody mentioned this fount of unbelievable awesomeness? (To be fair, one of my best electives in collitch was a class called Nomads, Steppes, and Cities, which did hint at it quite a bit.)

What can I say? It’s research.

(Also, the Epilogue should be pretty great: it’s called The Barbarians, and claims to unpack the history of Western cultural stereotypes about barbarians…)

Also, due to a small ’splosion of ire on my internets a few days ago, I am thinking about the lines between joking about something harmful in order to make it possible to process it and joking about something in a way that trivializes it. Because, of course, I read a fair number of SF blogs, and some YA blogs, and there’s quite often an undercurrent of how we deal with race & cultures & other things that aren’t our own. It’s a big issue.

And for fun, I write novels. (Sometimes.) Believe me, I worry about how my “cultural appropriation” comes across. I like to think of myself as someone who does it mostly so I can learn, rather than contributing to glorification of various hideously colonialist misinterpretations. Or, you know, whatever. (Hence the research. My current project is an alternate/second world history of part of the Mongol empire. Kinda.)

(Also, I don’t necessarily think that abnormal should have a negative connotation. Just sayin’…)

But what I really want to be doing (aside from reading history) is embroidering a rug. Which is, clearly, a long-term project. And one I don’t have the materials for. But apparently there’s a technique which uses chain stitch on sturdy backing, and makes fabulous spirals and curves, and I really like the idea of making rugs. (Although, really, latch hook is pretty fun. Despite  a certain similarity in result to shag carpeting, and therefore something out of the ’70s. Not everything about the ’70s was awful, though. I’m pretty sure.)

And I’ve been watching Hill Street Blues, which I haven’t watched in, oh lordy. Probably more than fifteen years, tho’ I don’t want to dwell on that. It’s still really good. (And I’m surprised by how much of it I remember, and by the fact that one of the more delightful secondary characters from Star Trek (hi, I’m a huge geek, just so you know) was in an episode. So my facial recognition skills aren’t as bad as I thought they were.)

Now I’m just procrastinating. I bet there’s a more productive way to avoid doing things that might be misconstrued as work…

Can’t talk. Geology.

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Banded Iron

… All right, I’ve been doing this incredibly slowly. I blame the satin stitch. What was I thinking?

On the other hand, it’s bizarrely satisfying. I’m hoping it will be finished by May.

Is there anybody out there?

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

No?

Good.

1. How many people out there would pay $175 dollars a pop for nifty … huh. Actually, now that I think about this, it might not be a bad idea. The question is one of editorial oversight, and I suppose a little legal consideration: but. Nice editions of public domain books? Not actually a terrible idea. I mean, at least that much each, and oh boy limited edition… and what would Google say? (Also, I’d have to get over my fear of InDesign and figure out how to actually make printing four-up or eight-up work.)

2. I am fairly certain that I need to get over the detached chain stitch, which I am using to make lazy daisies, and … it’s out of hand.

3. There’s something broken in the way people think about books. I can’t figure out what it is. Well, ok, some of it is that people are unwilling to think critically in a historical context, and some of it is that I think we’ve lost track, as a group, of how bookselling profit works. You know, think back to lending libraries. It’s just like Netflix. Only with paper. And less mail. (Of course, who remembers that there used to be multiple daily mail deliveries in certain places?)

4. Why does anybody want to work in a bookstore, anyway?