Well, for certain values of perfect. The beginning and end of my day were brilliantly planned – no, really, I did it on purpose – for stunning contrast. If today was a photograph … right. Never mind.
It started with dropping coffee. That part was accidental, and sad. I didn’t let it stop me from driving through Sullivan Square, which is no fun to navigate at the best of times, and even worse when you’ve dropped your coffee instead of drinking it. Whatever. Navigation by faith does work around here, which I think is beyond weird but I can’t explain the lack of getting lost in any other way. The potholes did try to eat the van, but it was so nasty they spat it right back out.
I arrived at my appointment, and … well. Talk about entering a different world. Rich people’s stuff has this whole set of connotations that even middle class stuff doesn’t have. Well, actually. That might not be true. It’s the difference between having stuff because it’s worth a lot and having stuff because you like it or you need it, and I can’t get a good grip on it.
My reward was getting to go to the Slavoj Zizek talk after work. (Hooray for the awesomeness of getting on the guest list at the last minute.) It was sold out, and then some. I got myself a nice comfy seat in the back and knitted a couple of rows on my current sock (sock club yarn must get used up before I do anything else) until the interesting bits started.
My notes are less than coherent, for which I apologize.
He started with a lovely statement on Starbucks and their manipulative charity: every overpriced cappucino you buy saves an African child. (Aside: every book you buy saves a bookseller. I thought about standing up an waving, actually.) And he talked about Walter Benjamin, who I find deeply entertaining. No, I don’t remember what he said … But he went into the violence inherent in language, which is an idea I clearly need to do a spot of reading on.
I am fairly sure that his relationship with Hegel is unnatural.
There were a couple of fragments I had to write down: “the most elementary torture of language is poetry” (something to do with Jelinek’s (I think) torturing language to tell truth) and “disgusting opportunisms of wisdom” (on proverbs). Then he got into “obscene divinity” and carnival – and freedom being the opportunity to carry guns and kill people.
There was a really good bit on the most recent Batman movie and Kung Fu Panda. (Batman’s subtext is kind of like Stalin’s subtext: some reading between the lines that says, something like “we know you’re not a … british spy or whatever, but the fiction is necessary.” I knew Batman was a fascist, but man.) The Kung Fu Panda was on belief, and how nobody actually believes in anything, except we pretend to in order to make things work … He said Life is Beautiful would’ve been a much more complex movie if it had turned out that the kid only believed in order to make things easier on his father … I don’t remember Life is Beautiful all that well, actually, but the Santa Claus comparison was pretty apt. In the sense of kids saying “No, I don’t believe in Santa Claus. Do you think I’m an idiot? But I pretend so my parents will be happy.)
Let’s see. John Carpenter’s ideological sunglasses. And the Eastern European poetical-military complex. Clearly, I need to read more.
Two more things I found particularly nice: the comment on blackmail charity (see again the one overpriced cappucino will pay for this – insert starving third-world child here – child’s food for a month. Or whatever.) that encourages us to just throw money at a problem without ever thinking about it. And the way attitudes towards certain things – global warming, specifically – have changed really abruptly without any particular acknowlegement that they have. At the very end, when he was carrying on well past time (there were some people getting antsy up front), he made this comment on how we’ve taken to actually debating things like the U.S. participating in torture: well, how would you feel about living in a society where it was actually a serious debate on whether or not women should be raped. That would be absolutely absurd. And apalling.
He took that more or less where I’d take it: these people, with their debates on these issues, shouldn’t be taken seriously because it’s not debatable. Not in any culture any of us want to live in, anyway. (I’ve been saying for quite some time that we should start a movement to just laugh these “issues” out of the, um, political world.)
And I’m starting to understand the impulse to go from philosophy to cooking. I think I need to start making intensely practical things. Too bad I don’t know how to build houses. It’s time for me to learn how to weave, though. At least that way I’ll be warm when the world ends.
In any case. That was definitely an evening well-spent, and I have some books to track down and read. (Like my list wasn’t already a mile and a half long.)